The Judiciary and the Rule of Law |
Some would argue that of our three branches of government, it is the judiciary that carries the greatest burden in ensuring that the Rule of Law prevails. They are the gatekeepers. The key element, acknowledged world-wide, is "judicial independence". In the federal courts we provide that protection by awarding lifetime appointments. In most state courts, however, the judiciary serves at the will of the electorate either by election to office or retention elections after appointment. Does this weaken their independent judgments? Experts are divided but most say the system works. How are Judges to carry out their burden? What is their role?
|
Judicial Methodology and the Rule of Law
|
|
Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law
|
|
In Praise of the Rule of Law
|
|
How Judges Think - or Should Think
|
|
A
Judge's Role in the Rule of Law "On The Rule of Law - History Politics, Theory" by Brian Tamanaha and "The Rule of Law in America" by Ronald Cass. |
|
Democracy and Rule of Law Must Prevail
|
|
Independent Judiciary: Core of the Rule of Law
|
|
United Nations - Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary
|
|
Video |
A Conversation on the Constitution: Judicial Independence Supreme Court Justices Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy, and Sandra Day O’Connor speak with high school students from California and Pennsylvania about the importance of an independent judiciary. Taped in May 2006 at the Supreme Court, the Justices answer students’ questions and discuss the significance of the judiciary in the federal government and the ways in which independence is protected by the Constitution. |